Antibiotics came into our lives as free of infections that have plagued mankind for thousands of years. But with the emergence of powerful new drugs on them began as "weapons of mass destruction, murder all life." The scientific debate about antibiotics in the midst, and we have already today, it is important to know what antimokrobnaya therapy helps the body cope with the disease, causing minimum harm.
A longstanding familiarity with this group of drugs does not apply unreasonable and haphazard. Will joke played our habit of some doctors appoint antibiotics for any reason, with the slightest hint of infection. (Of course, this is done with the best of intentions, to heal more quickly and effectively). Estimates of American Scientists, in a second (!) If antibiotics are taken unnecessarily or without the advice of a doctor. The results of the "crowding out known. Antibiotics, overwhelming, not only pathogenic, but useful micro digestive tract, and have contributed to an unbalanced ulcers and allergies. It breached the balance of microorganisms in the environment leads to a weakening immunity and excessive breeding not harmless single night. This is particularly true for broad-spectrum antibiotics. In addition, disease-causing germs proved to be remarkably tenacious. While the drugs found that the drug kills only sensitive to the bacteria. The strongest of them survive, in their cell mutation occurs. So, each day fed army supermikrobov resistant to antibiotics. This leads scientists to create new products based on new strains.
Incidentally, the British medical chosen strictly limited mass fascination with antibiotics. Recently, doctors are not allowed to prescribe these drugs to runny nose, coughing, ARI, light gastrointestinal disorders and other serious ailments. If without antimicrobial therapy, would be appointed minimum dose of drugs. And, the treatment of these infections were trying to restrict 3-4 days (whereas previously had "to sit on antibiotics" a week or longer). Now there are hundreds of drugs, selective agents operating in various diseases. Are all antimicrobial drugs can be regarded as antibiotics? In the medical literature, the term "antibiotic often used to all antimicrobial funds. But true antibiotic drugs are based on substances produced by micro-organisms or from semi ways. Active components of these drugs cause death or stop the growth of pathogens, bacteria and some of the simplest. Antibiotics should not be confused with synthetic antibacterial agents that are different from their effect on the mechanism of infection and the organism as a whole. Known to many drugs biseptol, furatsilin, furazolidon, metronidazole, Paline, nitroksolin-no antibiotics. Is it true that any infection can be eliminated by potent antibiotics? But their effectiveness is proven and in the treatment of serious illnesses, and in the fight against banal rhinitis or acne. Antibiotics are powerless against the virus and other infectious diseases. Since most cold and acute respiratory infections are viral nature, it is futile to fight them with antibiotics (such as ampicillin, erythromycin) or other antibacterial drugs (Amoxil, Cipro, Zithromax). The same could be said of influenza, measles, rubella, chicken pox, mumps, hepatitis A, B, C and so on. In these diseases, as well as with ARI, antibiotics can be appointed only after the emergence of bacterial complications, a secondary infection. Principal same treatment should be done drugs other groups. Antibiotics are unable to cope with mushrooms, the simplest and worms that cause infections. These include mushrooms kind ith concerns molochnitsu, simple micro-amoeboids, lyamblii. It is also known that diphtheria, botulism, tetanus develop after entering the body of bacterial toxins.
As a special treat an antitoxic serum : without them the disease can end tragically, even in the face of antimicrobial therapy. In some chronic infections, such as medicine, antibiotics are appointed only in times of increasing. In the future, use of synthetic antimicrobial and phytotherapy. Unfounded be treated with antibiotics get aired. Antimicrobial Chemotherapy in dermatology be applied in extreme cases. You always have the alternative to this treatment-natural anti funds. It is especially desirable destination antibiotics to treat ulcers unbalanced because of their deleterious effects on normal microbiota and the suppression of intestinal immunity. Still, the scope of antibiotics is a rapidly progressive infection or bacterial infection of vital organs, which the immune system can handle herself. Science now become familiar with all the destructive capacity of new antibiotics. It may abandon them altogether and replace them with other drugs? Without antibiotics are required if it is a life and death. Still, they are "centre stage" in dealing with sepsis, intoxication tuberculosis. So far there are no other drugs that can so powerfully and quickly deal with the disease, a life threatening. Fearing potential harm of antibiotics, some drugs ignored appointed doctor even in serious condition. Indeed, some of them may cause side effects. But there are drugs that are taken in parallel with antibiotics as a cover. For example, suprastin, tavegil protivogistaminnye and other means to significantly reduce the risk of developing allergies. Bifikol or atsilakt almost no reduces the likelihood of an unbalanced intestines. Similarly, dependence on antibiotics never formed.
"to sit on antibiotics" are indispensable for acute disease, angina and pneumonia, as well as infectious pneumonia, which is localized in the closed cavity (ear, nasal, osteomyelitis, Abscess, phlegmon). There is appoint people antibiotics after surgery. Without the use of antibiotics often develop serious complications. For example, if the treatment of pneumonia or sinusitis passed without these drugs may be low chronic diseases There are many chronic diseases that reduce the quality of life, but only treated with antibiotics. This mikoplazmennaya infection lung yersinioz, chlamydia and other urogenital infection. Of course, choosing an antibiotic, the physician should evaluate testimony and contraindications. As with the appointment of hormonal and other potentially dangerous drugs to be well count of the benefits and risks of side effects. When an antibiotic helped once, then it can be successfully used for other illnesses? Strangely enough, but causing diseases with similar symptoms may not be very different from each other. In addition, all bacteria have different sensitivities to different antibiotics. For example, if the person recovered after aureus pneumonia with penicillin, it does not mean that they must also treat cough emerged later. Indeed, the cause may not be Staphylococcus and mycoplasms, insensible to the penicillin drugs.
Moreover, antibiotic, "activated" one can not cut at the same rights with the same disease. Indeed, the bacteria quickly adapt to drugs and reuses they know how to survive in a meeting with them. Antibiotics, drugs, time-tested. Is that choose to be attended by a doctor so? We refer to the appointment of an antibiotic as a very serious step. Any charges are inappropriate. To treatment has been successful have to select a single product, which will work in your case. Amateurism in pharmacy, which we are all very difficult to envisage and toxic side effects. And they almost always occur when incorrect dosage and the lack of "shield" that prevents the complications. Moreover, their actions we are adding illiterate ranks microorganisms resistant to a particular antibiotic. And finally, we alone are unlikely to be able to calculate how many days should last antimicrobial therapy. Correctly select product can be identified and the cause of its sensitivity to antibiotics. However, the full information of such an analysis impossible. Even if the cause is known and its sensitivity, you find a product, which comes to the "camps" germ in the body. Dose of drug depends on the age and related diseases, and not always in line with the recommended annotations, which takes into account the medium, rather than individual settings. Of course, compare all this information can only experienced professional. Perhaps if taking a very powerful antibiotic, in a couple days from the disease and no footprints. So why download organism long treatment, because it can continue to cope with the disease itself? An adequate duration of treatment is half the success. Very often the product itself has been cancelled after one or two days of receipt, as it becomes easier. But weakened organism is not always capable of fighting disease itself. Again, the infection can move into the slack will worsen heart failure, kidney problems and more. It is premature lifting of emerging antibiotic resistant strains to the "remaining" bacteria. On the other hand, if adopted antibiotic unnecessarily long, increasing the risk of an unbalanced bowel or allergies.
A woman making antibiotics during pregnancy or nursing, causing irreparable harm to her child. And what if this period is required antimicrobial therapy? Some antibiotics have no effect on intrauterine and further development of the child. This is basically the most "old" drugs-penitsilliny, erythromycin and some others. Yet in the first half of pregnancy and give more of them, not to mention hard cash. It is not advised to take antibiotics from 12 to 17 weeks of pregnancy. At that time, only a placenta and the child is not protected from the harmful effects of drugs, which takes future mother. If possible, antimicrobial therapy should be moved to a later date and hold it from 20 weeks. When the protective sheathing finally emerge, doctors are beginning to prescribe antibiotics in a "free" mode. There is a roster of products that could be included during pregnancy, but there are those who can not be taken at this time in any way. For example, ftorhinalony affect bone growth of the child and further the cause of all diseases. A group of drugs tetratsiklinovoy painted teeth of a child in black. Of course, if a pregnant woman happens worsening appendicitis, pneumonia or inflammation of the kidneys, antibiotics is the only way to alleviate the situation. Is it true that antibacterial drugs, which are not to antibiotics, are less destructive force "and" affect the body more gently? It has been found that the antibacterial drugs, self-biseptolom, sulfadimezinom-more often leads to allergic reactions or goiter than receiving antibiotics. In addition, many synthetic drugs have toxic effects on the liver and kidneys. A sulfanilamidam, for example, microorganisms growing resistance. Their impact was much weaker modern antibiotics. "Bad" drugs did not exist. It might not appoint them to the place of incompetent doctors. And too often we take the liberty to decide such delicate issues. Perhaps the change to the antibiotics that we have to swallow some of the working and after each slightest temperature increase?
